Ecosystem Services Provisioning and Regulating Definitions
March 28, 2019 at 1:16 AMThe sections below provide the definition and define the set-up for the indicators for Provisioning (PRO) and Regulation and Support (REG) under Ecosystem Services. The tables define the granularity of the spatial unit (SU) to be used for the calculation, the type of data that maybe used in calculation process as well as the minimum data that should be used for process. Finally, in line with the theoretical framework, the possible definitions for the objective (for determining threshold), scope (F1), frequency (F2) and amplitude (F3) are provided.
Provisioning (Pro) Services
Provisioning measures the material outputs from freshwater ecosystems that are used for human benefit.
Water supply reliability relative to demand (WaSD)
Water supply reliability relative to demand is calculated as the net water demand from various sectors (municipal, industry, agriculture, hydropower), the environmental and, where relevant, navigational flow requirements with respect to total freshwater availability. This indicator takes into account the reliability and variability, or seasonality, of freshwater supply relative to demand (Brown and Lall 2006; Grey and Sadoff 2007). The probability that an ecosystem meets demand is dependent on a combination of system attributes, inflows and demands whereby a system may, for example, be water-rich during wet seasons but water-deficient in dry seasons.
Spatial Unit: | Location/demand sites and sectors; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | Summary of monthly demand from various sectors and the supply actually provided. |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | Local (monthly or seasonal) data for 1-5 years |
Objective: | Water demand is met |
F1: | Where demand is not met |
F2: | Frequency with which monthly demand is not met |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion: The difference between supply and demand when demand is not met |
- Environmental flow requirements and actual discharge at monitored points in the rivers.
Biomass for consumption (BiCN)
Biomass for consumption measures the availability of fisheries, wild food, fiber and other materials from freshwater systems for human consumption (TEEB 2011). The availability of these ecosystem services relies on the availability of adequate quantities and quality of fresh water, and may very likely be affected by seasonal patterns of flow (e.g., fisheries yields can be affected by the extent of flood-plain inundation).
Spatial Unit: | Fishing lots/sub-basins; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | Estimates of biomass used/acquired for consumption; can be in the form of catch or production units as available. |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | Data will be site specific and availability will vary considerably |
Objective: | Based on loss of productivity |
F1: | Sub-basins where catch/productivity has dropped |
F2: | How frequently is the reported catch/productivity below expected levels? |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion based on: the magnitude of loss of catch/productivity |
Regulation And Support Services
Regulation and support services measure the regulating, maintenance and support aspects of freshwater ecosystems that provide benefits to people beyond provisioning (de Groot et al. 2002).
Sediment regulation (SeRG)
Sediment regulation measures the degree to which drainage basins regulate erosion and control sediment dynamics (transportation and deposition) as well the nutrients that may be bound to transported particles. This has important implications for agricultural productivity (especially of floodplains) and supply of particles to deltas and nutrients to coastal waters (Le et al. 2007). Conversely, high rates of erosion, siltation and sedimentation have negative impacts on in-stream habitat conditions, biodiversity and river infrastructure (Ward and Stanford 1995).
Spatial Unit: | Reservoirs, deltas, flood plains and/or river reaches; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | 1. Current reservoir sedimentation rate or loss of capacity rate and design threshold for sediment deposition in the reservoir. 2. River bank erosion 3. Rate of deposition on floodplain and threshold, if any 4. Area and/or rate of deposition/erosion from delta; and expected or average rate based on historical records |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | Local sources for past 1-5 years |
Objective: | Expected deposition or erosion of floodplain/delta based on design threshold |
F1: | Number of locations where threshold is exceeded |
F2: | Frequency with deposition/erosion incidence exceed threshold (annually) |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion: difference between actual rate and threshold |
Deviation of water quality metrics from benchmarks (DvWQ)
Deviation of water quality metrics from benchmarks (water regulation) indicates the ability of the freshwater ecosystem to deliver water of the required water-quality standards for different sectors and, thus, can be used as a proxy measure of the regulatory service of filtration and water purification (de Groot et al. 2002).
Spatial Unit: | River reaches/sub-basin; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | Target ‘class’ WQ targets for the river reach considered and the actual ‘class’ or actual WQ quality of that reach |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | Monthly modelled or recorded WQ for 1-5 years and WQ targets of each reach |
Objective: | WQ target is met |
F1: | Number of locations where WQ target is not met |
F2: | Frequency with which WQ targets are not met |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion: gap between WQ targets and actual values |
Flood regulation (FlRG)
Flood regulation measures the extent to which the condition and functioning of a river basin is damaged through exposure to floods (MEA 2005) or its absence.
Spatial Unit: | City or sub-basin; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | Flood outlines, interception of flow in upstream areas |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | Floods frequency/statistics over the past 5 years with flood lines if available or record of intensity/damage. |
Objective: | Based on damage severity |
F1: | Number of locations where floods occurred |
F2: | Frequency of flood incidences |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion: ranking based on extent of damage to flood regulation supply |
Exposure to water-associated diseases (ExWD)
Spatial Unit: | Cities/sub-basin; aggregate to basin |
---|---|
Type/Class of Input required: | Identify important water associated diseases for the region and incidence or fatality rate |
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: | From local administration for last 5 years |
Objective: | Based on incidence ratio or case-fatality ratio |
F1: | Number of locations where disease occurs |
F2: | Frequency of disease outbreak |
F3: | Amplitude/Excursion: based on either incidence ratio or case-fatality ratio |
Other notes:
As a broad heading, we are assessing water associated infectious diseases which can be classified into one of five categories (Yang et al. 2012):
-
water-borne, enteric microorganisms (e.g., typhoid and cholera) that enter water sources through fecal contamination and cause infection through ingestion of contaminated water. Also includes water-borne pathogens (e.g., Cryptosporidium, Giardia) transmitted through ingestion of, or exposure to, contaminated water. They can be described as water-carried diseases and are a subset of water-borne diseases;
-
water-based, caused by flukes or nematodes which have an aquatic phase to their life cycle, (e.g., schistosomiasis);
-
water-related, transmitted by insect vectors that have an aquatic phase to their life cycle (e.g., malaria and trypanosomiasis);
-
water-washed, transmission is due to poor personal and/or domestic hygiene resulting from a lack of appropriate water; and
-
water-dispersed, infections of agents that proliferate in fresh water and enter the human body through the respiratory tract (e.g., Legionella).