Bank Modification measures lateral connectivity between the river or lake and its floodplain or riparian zone. It also provides a measure of the changes to instream processes and habitats likely to result from bank modification. However, directly measuring changes to connectivity, habitats and processes is difficult. Thus, as a proxy we measure the percentage of river channels (could also include lakeshores) affected by human modification, such as channelization or shoreline hardening.

Percent Channel affected by Modification (pCM)

Attributes
Scale of calculation: Sub-basin; aggregate to single value per basin
Range of Output: 100 indicates no modification and 0 highly is modified
Reference: Nil
Type/Class of Input required: (1) GIS layer of river network (2) Location of structures along the river including dykes, levees, channelization, etc. (3) Land use map
Suggested source of ‘minimum’ data to enable calculation: (1) HydroSHEDS/HydroBASINS river network with manual correction at outflow (2) LandSAT imagery when appropriate (3) Aqua Monitor: http://aqua-monitor.appspot.com/ may be useful (4) Most recent Land use map

Calculation in FHI Toolbox:

1. GIS processing

  1. Create a polygon based on buffer zone along streams and rivers. Default buffer size: 100m. If possible, allow user input.

  2. Intersect buffer polygon with land-cover data to generate table of land cover.

2. Classification (User-input)

For each land-cover type identified, assign weight based on following decision-matrix:

Degree of naturalness Management of water cycle Pollution emissions Vegetation characteristics Examples Weight
Natural and semi-natural None None Native Forest (primary and secondary); lakes (natural) and wetlands; native grasslands; native shrublands 100
Cultural assisted system Low Low Mixed, high diversity Mosaic native vegetation (>50%, vegetation cover <50%) 70
Low Low Mixed, moderate diversity Mosaic cropland (>50%, natural vegetation <50%) 60
Transformed system Low Low Permanent cover with atypical species Permanent pasture land; agroforestry; tree crops 50
Low to Moderate Moderate to High Seasonal cover with atypical species Non-irrigated arable land 40
High Moderate to High Seasonal cover with atypical species Permanently irrigated arable land 30
Completely artificial High Moderate to High Sparse cover with grass Urban park space; low-density suburban areas; barren land 10
High High None Urban commercial areas; mining areas 0

3. Aggregation

Scores within a sub-basin can be calculated as:

$$ CM = \left( \ \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{m}{N_{i}\text{CM}_{i}}}{\text{TN}} \right)*100 $$

where, TN is the total number of raster cells in buffer polygon of m type, Ni is the number of cells of land cover type ith, and CMi is the appropriate score from the table directly above for that land-cover.